a lot of United fans still thinking in Ronaldo-Rooney-Tevez

when it's not exactly a sparkling record

ignore history

but it's easier for man to like

like not that you have no history

Https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c7/af/70 ... 1ef5e5.jpg

it is just facts tho

Caesar wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

No one at City was like "we got 'istory, mate!"

tbf cause u aint have none

it doesn't matter how many trophies you won before, you gotta do things based on your current situation

Yeah istory of being in the fucking third tier. Shut the fuck up

No one at City was like "we got 'istory, mate!"

You know why City shot to stardom with that oil money and Newcastle up here waddling in mid-table?

We are an upper mid-table club

yep.

They can't stop looking at the fucking past

The biggest issue with all of these clubs, ESPECIALLY the English ones is the same thing

that might be a bit extreme but u gotta start from scratch

like the ideal process for United rn is treating it as if the club basically didn't exist before INEOS came

this shit gonna need to get worse before it gets better

i been telling United fans

oh also

ah that makes sense then

And he managed 1,500

Since the article says "800 matches"

Think it's only PL

his first few years were very bad

I swear his overall at United was 59%

maybe if you only count PL?

I don't think Fergie is even 65%

Then Klopp at 64ish%

we need that energy in the final

Xixak wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

that has to be the highest

It is. Sir Alex is second at 65%

Xixak wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

not in City vs. whoever

https://www.espn.com/soccer/report/_/gameId/660276

over that kind of period