that actually feels not insanely unrealistic

just signed Yans Sommer

actually maybe a GK is the best way to do this...

prob gotta go shopping in saudi

imma try to do it tho cause i like completing the objectives, makes the game sort of interesting i guess

not only does it make zero sense for a newly promoted side to sign a player like that (or one to join) but it will use my whole transfer budget lol

this has to be one of the stupidest objectives i've seen yet

apparently taht means 85+ rating 30 years or older...

one of my requirements for this season is sign a veteran player

hmm

Man Jack Clarke ended up in the top 5 goal scorers in the league for me even tho he missed half the season

i might be singing a different tune in the heat of it after losing 6-0 today tho

2.) If there's no clear better option there's no real reason to sack

1.) If ten Hag were available rn that's probably who we'd hire

yeah I'm starting to think more along those lines

Not without a clear plan on how to move forward

like would u look to move him on

Caesar wrote: ↑

Today, 09:08

Xixak wrote: ↑

Today, 08:56

Caesar would you sack ten Hag

To hire who...?

just in general

I just shot a +13 in PGA lol

Conte

Xixak wrote: ↑

Today, 08:56

Caesar would you sack ten Hag

To hire who...?

but idk if that's the right way to look at it

part of me is like... if ten Hag were available rn and hadn't already managed us, that's probably who we'd try to get

if you were in charge of Man United

Caesar would you sack ten Hag

yeah City have won

6-4

crazy

players just not interested in running to the ball

5-4 City.

4-4.

Shooting range being anything within 50 yards

I swear the CPU scores every fucking free kick thats in shooting range.

they just scored a free kick from so far away

fuck me dude.